| IIF/1997 |
25th February,1997 |
Budget
1997: Expectations & Needs |
Budget
1997 is expected to pro-poor, inflationary and not likely to
be growth oriented, said Prof. J.D Agarwal , Director, Inian
Institute of Finance in a seminar on 'Budget 1997 : Needs and
Expectation' on 25th February 1997. Accroding to Prof .Agarwal
the Govt. would probably focus on social sector and would announce
a number of welfare schemes. Fiscal deficit may not be contained
to 5 per cent of GDP.The inflation may be double digited by
June'1997. The govt. might announce incentives to attract foreign
direct investment in infrastructue and to revive the capital
market.Additional resources are likely to be generated by widening
the tax base.
The
Finance Minister will have to balance a variety of conflicting
objective with heavy constraints on financial resources. It
would include, the heavy fiscal deficit, the debt service ratio,
lower export growth rate, mounting oil pool deficit, the heavy
financial burden due to pay Commission recommendations, heavy
debt burden, weak tax administration, existence of massive corruption,
black money and capital flight.
Most
of the seven broad objective outlined by the Finance Minister
in his maiden budget speech on 22nd July, 1996 have not been
attained in the last eight month. The Union budget 97 should
focus on objectives of growth social justice, containing inflation
to single digit, controlling corruption and black money. Additional
resources are required to provide for increase in the absolute
amount of explicit and implicit subsidies, pay hikes, oil pool
deficit, infrastructure needs like power and roads, additional
allocations programmes, primary education, and public health.
While the demand for available scarce resources is massive there
is a pressure for containing fiscal deficit well below 5% of
GDP, reduction of tax rates, raising exemption limits, reduction
in excise duties adn measures to boost stock market and capital
market, said Pof. Agarwal. Disinvas a recipe for raising additional
resource has not clicked.
There
may be an increase in the minimum exemption limit to Rs. 54,000
instead of justifiably expected limit of Rs. 50,000 in the budget
to give relief to the salaried class. The maximum limit of investment
under section 80L may be also be increased from the current
level of Rs. 13000 to Rs. 16000. Similarly maximum amount of
investment allowed for tax purposes under section 88 may be
increased from Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 70000, as larger saving are
reuired in the economy both for investment and boosting the
capital market.
There
is a strong justification for with drawl of minimum Alternative
Tax (MAT), introducedm in July 1996 , as its introduction to
raise additional revenue was a breach of faith on the part of
Government to take advantage of tax incentives offered from
time to time , and made promises to invstors, were asked to
pay minimum alternative tax (MAT) . However , if for revenue
considerations MAT is not with drawn , the anomalies such as
calculation of depreciation as per Companies Act insted of Income
Tax Act, which exit in the working of MAT should be removed.
This will provide some relie to corporation, commented Prof.
Agarwal.
There
might be some rductions in excise duties and customs duties
to meet the international reqirements.
To
generate additional revenue, as attempt might be made to widen
the tax base by taxing services such as transprot services,
railway services, domestic air traval of revising international
travel tax from like power and roads. There may even be a possibity
that he house owners and car owners may be asked to minimum
tax for owning these assets. Widening the tax base as a recipe
may under the present circumstances might prove to be counter
productive as widening the tax base would only widen corruption
and loosen the tax compliance.
To
contain fiscal deficit below 5 persent of GDP the government
should improve tax collection and exercise more vigorously control
over public expenditure, although containing fiscal deficit
for a developing economy like ours cannot and should not be
the main objective of budget. Controlling public expenditure
is not easy but the govenment should try to increase the productive
efficiency of each rupee spent.
The
budget is likely to be concerned about the capital market.The
stok market has shown some improvement in last two weeks. RBI
has already brought CRR and SLR at reasonable level to provide
enough liquidity in the eonomy. The budget might allow investment
of a part of provident fund or pension funds in the securities
or bonds. The capital market should be left to itself without
interference or support from the government so as to follow
the rules of market driven economic System.
The
Finance Minister might announce setting up regulattory agencies
for foreign direct investment in infrastructure particulary
in power and roads. It might increase the budgetory provision
towards the authorised share capital of Infrstructure Captial
Development Finance Company (IDFC) . The financial institution
like LIC and some of the leading commercial banks including
RBI might be asked to contribute towards the share capital market
fail to meet the capital market expectation, according to Prof.
Agarwal
Prof.
Agarwal also said to compete globally industry is rightly asking
for a level playing field for domestic industry. It is also
rightly complaining about high interset rates and existence
of laws like FERA. The government should bring about necessary
amendments in various economic legislation in the wake of changing
economic secnario. India is a dynamic economy and various legislation
need to be changed acccordingly to suit the needs of the economy.
Press
Secretary
IIF Business School |
|